|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fire Up That Fat Furnace
Your metabolism can decline with
age unless you keep fueling your calorie burner.
Learn ways to rev your engine.
WebMD Feature from "EatingWell"
By Rachel Johnson, Ph.D., M.P.H., R.D.
Over a cup of tea recently, a 40-something
friend confided that she’d had a glimpse of the
future and she didn’t like it. She had decided
to weigh herself that morning, something she
hadn’t done in a while. When she stepped on the
scale, the needle climbed to a point where it
hadn’t gone since her pregnancy nine years
before.
“What’s happening to me?” she lamented. “My
metabolism must be starting its middle-age
slowdown.”
Metabolism, a greatly misunderstood process of
the human body, takes the brunt of many a
middle-age whine. People conclude that a slower
metabolism is an inevitable part of aging and
beyond their control. The truth, however, is
more reassuring. Our bodies do change as we age,
and metabolism can take a dive as a result, but
we hold the key to avert this decline.
Metabolism, the process by which our bodies burn
calories (food energy), has three components:
resting metabolic rate, the thermic effect of
food, and physical activity.
Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is the energy we
use at rest to perform basic body functions like
breathing and sleeping. In most people, this
accounts for about 60 to 70 percent of their
total daily energy expenditure (about 1,450
calories a day for a 140-pound woman). Because
muscle is the body’s metabolically active
tissue, RMR is almost totally determined by the
amount of lean body (muscle) mass a person has.
For the most part, we all have the same
metabolism per amount of lean body mass. Most
women have more body fat in proportion to muscle
mass than men, and thus women generally have
metabolic rates that are 5 to 10 percent lower
than men of the same height and weight. Unfair
as it may be, that means most men use up more
calories just sitting on the couch than the
women sitting next to them do.
The RMR of most people goes down by 2 to 3
percent with each decade once we reach our
thirties, a direct result of the loss of muscle
mass that often accompanies aging. Luckily, we
can prevent this loss with regular
strength-training exercises, which are designed
to build or preserve muscle.
The thermic effect of food (TEF) is the energy
we use to burn calories or, more explicitly, to
digest, absorb and metabolize our food. When you
eat a 110-calorie snack, for example, 10 of
those calories are used for TEF. It is a
relatively small portion of our total
metabolism: about 10 percent, or 240 daily
calories, for a 140-pound woman.
Our greatest control over metabolism lies with
physical activity. It’s also the most easily
thwarted, living as we do in a world of
drive-through banks, escalators, leaf blowers
and the omnipresent computer. Unless you are one
of the rare people whose job requires you to be
moving throughout the day, you probably need to
work deliberately at increasing your
physical-activity level. The less time you have
for exercise, the more vigorously you should
move. I can jog 21⁄2 miles in 30 minutes or I
can burn the same number of calories on a
leisurely hourlong walk. I frequently wear a
step-counter to monitor my goal of 10,000 steps
a day, the equivalent of 5 miles. After untold
hours in front of my computer, if I don’t spend
at least 45 minutes running or in an exercise
class, I don’t come anywhere close to my goal.
If I exercise enough I can indulge my love of
good food and savor a scrumptious dessert or
great glass of wine several times a week without
adding pounds.
Even fidgeting, which comes naturally to some
people, can increase energy expenditure above
resting levels by 300 to 600 calories per day.
My oldest son is one of those people who seem to
be blessed with “thin” genes. But after being
around him for more than two decades I think I
have a good idea what’s going on: he’s a
fidgeter. He is constantly tapping his foot and
shifting in his seat. (When he was little it
seemed we were always pleading with him to sit
still at the dinner table.) Compared to sitting
still, browsing in a store takes twice the
energy, while a slow walk (2 to 3 mph) can
triple energy expenditure.
I have no doubt my friend will get her weight
back to where she’d like it. She may have to
invest in some free weights and a little more
time running, but that’s all under her control.
We certainly can’t stop the years ticking by,
but keeping our metabolism youthful and burning
calories at a healthful rate is well within our
grasp.
|
Calories Burned in Action (over 1
hour - not counting the 77 calories
burned at rest)
|
|
Chewing
Gum |
11 |
|
Fidgeting |
70 |
|
Walking
1 mph |
119 |
|
Walking
2 mph |
158 |
|
Walking
3 mph |
228 |
WebMD Feature
from "EatingWell"
© WebMD Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
We
certainly can’t stop the years ticking by, but
keeping our metabolism youthful and burning calories
at a healthful rate is well within our grasp. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|